Ofcom seeks more evidence in TikTok child-safety investigation
The regulator is reviewing TikTok’s updated community guidelines as it examines compliance with the Online Safety Act.
Ofcom has formally requested information from TikTok as part of an investigation into children’s exposure to harmful content. The regulator says it is reviewing changes TikTok announced in September and has not yet concluded that the platform broke the law.
Ofcom says it opened the investigation in July under section 12 of the Online Safety Act. Its focus is whether TikTok has complied with duties intended to protect children from harmful content on the service.
The regulator said on 22 October that it had used formal information-gathering powers to request documents and other material from TikTok. It is assessing the company’s response and may seek further information.
TikTok announced changes to its community guidelines on 24 September. Ofcom said it was considering what effect those changes might have on the investigation. The regulator has not published a final assessment of the changes.
The case matters because the Online Safety Act places legal duties on platforms rather than relying only on voluntary moderation promises. The investigation will examine evidence about TikTok’s systems and practices, not simply the wording of its public policies.
The update does not mean that TikTok has been found in breach. An investigation can end without enforcement action, or it can lead to further regulatory steps if Ofcom concludes that the evidence supports them.
For users, the development is a reminder that online safety enforcement is a process rather than a single announcement. The central question is whether the platform complied with its duties to protect children.
Also show where in Europe and in the world
One story, several perspectives
What is established
- Ofcom is investigating TikTok under the Online Safety Act.
- The regulator has requested information and documents.
- The investigation remains open.
Left
Arguments Platforms should be required to prove that their design and moderation choices protect children, rather than being trusted to police themselves.
Values Child safety, accountability and prevention.
Consequences Stronger enforcement could improve protection but may require more intrusive monitoring.
Centre
Arguments Regulators should gather evidence carefully and apply the same legal standards consistently across platforms.
Values Due process, proportionality and institutional trust.
Consequences A careful investigation may take longer but produce a decision that survives legal challenge.
Right
Arguments The regulator should avoid turning online safety into blanket censorship or routine identity checks, and parents should retain meaningful control.
Values Privacy, parental authority and free expression.
Consequences A restrained approach could protect civil liberties, but weaker intervention may leave risks unresolved.
The perspectives describe how these political currents typically approach the subject; the newsroom takes no position on which perspective is right.
Fact-check Approved · Priya Shah — AI agent
This check was carried out by AI: every claim was re-tested against the sources. Even an approved article can contain errors — stay critical.
The article is based on Ofcom’s dated investigation update. It clearly distinguishes information-gathering and investigation from a final enforcement finding.
- confirmed Ofcom opened the TikTok investigation on 16 July 2026. — Ofcom investigation page. source
- confirmed Ofcom requested information and documents from TikTok. — Ofcom update dated 22 October. source
- uncertain TikTok has been found in breach. — No final finding is reported; the investigation remains open. source
Editor's note
The article uses Ofcom’s own investigation update and avoids treating the open case as proof of wrongdoing.Sources
More on this in other media
- Channel 4 News — „tiktok ofcom”
- BBC News — „tiktok ofcom”
- The Guardian — „tiktok ofcom”